How Quercus works
Quercus describes relative ecological value. Fit brings that value together with your planting conditions.
Quercus Score™
Native plants are compared using the wildlife they support and the habitat they provide. All supported states use the same North Carolina native reference group, with state-specific caterpillar records.
| Factor | Weight | What it describes |
|---|---|---|
| Caterpillars | 45% | Species that use the plant’s genus as a larval host. |
| Bees | 20% | Bee species recorded visiting the genus in the Southeast. |
| Specialist bees | 15% | Eastern bees that depend on particular pollen sources. |
| Birds | 10% | Bird species recorded eating seeds, fruit or other plant parts. |
| Habitat structure | 10% | Plant growth form as an indication of cover and nesting space. |
The weighted factors are ranked within the reference group. The highest 14% receive baseline scores of 80–100; the remaining scores run from 5–79. Additional recorded insect groups can contribute up to five points, with a maximum score of 100.
Each factor counts by rank, not by size, so a plant near the top for caterpillars gets nearly full credit: white oak’s 496 caterpillar species count only a little more than American holly’s 52. Holly and rosebay rhododendron also have more bee species and specialist bees on record than white oak, which has none, so they score higher overall.
Most wildlife counts describe a genus, so closely related plants can share a score. A plant with few records may simply be less studied. Conservation status describes rarity and protection separately.
Who uses each plant?
Open an animal row to see the available names and interactions. Caterpillar records describe larval food plants; flower visits and ant–seed interactions describe other uses. A visit is not necessarily pollination, and a seed interaction may involve dispersal or consumption.
The records include different geographic areas. Each group keeps its source and regional context.
Fit for your spot
Start with your county, then add sunlight, usual soil moisture and pH. Fit combines that information with ecological value. Unanswered questions stay open.
The starting estimate is 60 + 0.40 × Quercus. The least suitable known condition sets the adjustment: a match keeps the estimate; a mismatch reduces it. A recorded county receives full geographic weight. A recorded neighboring county sharing an ecoregion receives 95%. Without either, the result remains a preliminary estimate.
Fit helps compare planting choices; it is not a survival probability. Check mature size, drainage and your local climate as you plan.
Invasive and non-native plants
Listed invasive plants receive negative harm scores and a “Do not plant” recommendation. North Carolina uses its invasive-list ranks. Other states use matched harm profiles where available and −30 for listed invasives without a matched rank. Other non-native plants are not given a positive ecological score.
Reading the bands
Keystone: 80 and up · Strong: 50 to 79 · Good: 20 to 49 · Modest: 5 to 19 · Neutral: −5 to 4 · Harmful: −40 to −6 · Severe harm: below −40.
Sources
Quercus is an evolving index built from published plant and wildlife records.
- Caterpillars Count! (UNC Chapel Hill), Foliage Arthropod Data, NC sites, accessed 2026-09-23 (CC0). Data were provided by Caterpillars Count! and the many participants who contribute to its foliage arthropod monitoring program.
- Hurlbert, Olsen, Sawyer & Winner 2021, Avian Diet Database, Scientific Data 8: 260 (CC0)
- Narango, Tallamy & Shropshire 2020, Few keystone plant genera support the majority of Lepidoptera species, Nature Communications
- NC Native Plant Society & NC Invasive Plant Council, NC Invasive Plants list, 2023-11-07
- Niinemets & Valladares 2006, Tolerance to shade, drought and waterlogging of temperate Northern Hemisphere trees and shrubs, Ecological Monographs (CC0 appendix)
- Noori, Seltmann & Orr 2026, A curated and integrated dataset for exploring global bee-plant interactions (GloBI), Zenodo, CC BY 4.0
- Penn & Crist 2018, ant–seed interactions; USA/Canada observations
- Robertson 1929, Illinois flower visitors; GloBI contributor transcription (visits, not confirmed pollination)
- Shropshire & Tallamy 2025, Lepidoptera of North America north of Mexico, ZooKeys 1261 (ODbL)
- Smith, Bachelder, Russell, Morales, Mosher & Seltmann 2024, Bee-Specialization-Modeling v0.6.1 (specialist host table compiled from J. Fowler's pollen specialist bee lists), Zenodo, CC BY 4.0
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Wetland Plant List 2022, Eastern Mountains & Piedmont
- USDA National Invasive Species Information Center: common reed lineage distinction
- USDA NRCS PLANTS Database
- USDA NRCS PLANTS Database, growth habit (public domain)
- Vascular Plants of North Carolina, plant list export 2026-09-01 (LeGrand, Sorrie & Howard)
Caterpillar data derived from Shropshire & Tallamy are available under the Open Database License. Data credits (raw Markdown file)

